Are all Dominants basically the same?Absolutely NOT! I suppose there could be some generalities, but it's kind of like saying all humans are basically the same. The Dominants I know are very very different from each other.
Do all Dominants share similar characteristics?Maybe. As I think about the Doms I know, they all have a certain kind of confidence, but it's not always SELF-CONFIDENCE. I think in some cases, that is specifically why the D/s works...because the submissive provides an external source of reassurance of their dominance. Perhaps it is more like confidence to follow a gut instinct...?
I've always believed that Dominants share at least one basic principle and standard; the need to look after their property. Looking after their property can entail making decisions for them, guiding them in the choices they make and even protecting and insulating them from the sometimes harsh realities of life.Holy cow...I misread this the first time...I didn't read the first two sentences and I was so happy with the idea...But I misread it as the submissive's responsibility!
First of all, I do not identity with being anyone's property. I am not owned, I am not "mastered". I've tried to wear Beloved's collar, I tried to bend to Sir's desires, and I just couldn't do it...
Perhaps it is because I'm a service submissive?
I feel very responsible for looking after others, particularly those I "submit" to. I look after their "property"...I make certain mundane decisions so they don't have to be bothered...I research options to guide them in their decisions...I try to protect them from harsher realities...
and when I fail...it's devastating.
Really, it's very unrealistic for ANYONE...Dominant or submissive...to assume this kind of responsibility. The following question provides examples...
If you agree with this ideal do you believe that a submissive who is protected and guided must also be challenged to think and to become actively involved in decision-making processes? What happens in a T.P.E. relationship if a submissive is not expected or encouraged to participate in the mechanics of life and all of a sudden find herself cut adrift because of death, relationship breakdown or unemployment?I guess I need to back up...when we talk about D/s, we talk about it as a D/s RELATIONSHIP. It's a two-way street...to work, the individuals must interact. Thus, I believe that both a Dominant and a submissive are required to think and be actively involved in decision-making processes.
How does that work in TPE, consensual non-concent, slave relationship? *troubled look* I don't know. I know some people who claim such relationships, and I have talked/read about the agony when something comes up and the "s" is unable to give the absolute TPE, consensual non-concent, "slave" response. Or rather, when they are forced to choose between submitting to something that would break them (physically, spiritually, mentally), or to fight for their own self-preservation. It doesn't work...
Add to the that the "harsh realities" of life, such as "death, relationship breakdown or unemployment", and I just don't believe that a D/s relationship can protect us from real life. I don't think we can dominant or submit beyond our own human-ness. Our feelings, right or wrong, are our feelings. They can sometimes be suppressed, but no one can protect us from the internal experiences of feelings, and no one can truly protect us from real life.
How is that fine line between being looked after yet also standing up and being heard met? How do you achieve that balance in your relationship? Ahhhh...this is maybe the crux of my struggle with this particular discussion. None of the above truly fit my relationship with Beloved, and I struggle regularly with my identity as a "submissive". The balance, the D/s...it exists in a "unique" dynamic that is difficult to summarize.
Do none of the above criteria relate to your relationship? Is your relationship based on an equal sharing of power and decision-making? If so, how does your owner satisfy his need to look after you and your need to be cared for? Are those needs an essential part of your dynamic?This is probably more of where I fall... I don't really understand what people mean by "1950s relationships" and no one has ever really given a SOLID answer...but I suspect that is closest to what we have.
Beloved and I have a relationship, a partnership. It runs deep and true, and we each have roles that are essential to making it work. Beloved faces the stress and responsibility of the workforce. He "brings home the bacon". He takes care of me emotionally and spiritually, providing reassurances that I am valuable and giving me encouragement to explore the things I am intrigued by.
I stay home and take care of the house and the kids. I make decisions about bills, chores, and many social events. I provide him with a purpose for facing the daily grind and give him the appreciation to make it worth the efforts on the days when nothing seems to work out right.
Is this D/s? Is this "just" a healthy marriage? It comes back to labels...
"That which we call a rose. By any other name would smell as sweet." I don't know if I am a "submissive"...if Beloved is a "Dominant".

Knowing that there will be joy and pain that come from it, I do my very best to please him. I can do nothing less.